The workflow
Review the page, then decide.
This is a simulated workflow. No actual fax, scan, upload, patient record, or prior-authorization system is connected.
1 · A fictional document arrives
The demo queue contains invented referral, insurance, lab, and imaging examples.
2 · Uncertainty is visible
Low-confidence fields are marked for review and appear in the review-first filter.
3 · Staff sees why
Select a field to highlight the corresponding line on the fictional page.
4 · Staff decides
Confirmation remains locked until low-confidence fields are reviewed and any duplicate match is chosen.
Interactive review queue
A closer look at the inbox.
Select a fictional document, inspect its fields, and review the items marked low confidence.
Fictional documents
Mapped preview
Select “Show me why” to highlight a source line. Confidence labels are invented for this demonstration.
Two possible demo patients — staff must choose.
No automatic merge occurs.
Demo boundaries: No real patient data, document upload, diagnosis, clinical interpretation, filing, messaging, or prior-authorization submission. This demo makes no HIPAA, SOC 2, or other compliance claim. Confidence labels are invented; they are not measured accuracy. Staff make the final decision.
What works today, and what takes installation: Sort sample faxes and reports, see a confidence score and the reason on every field, review low-confidence handwriting first, and pick between possible duplicate patients yourself — nothing files itself. What this demo illustrates: how a clinic’s incoming paper would land sorted and review-ready instead of in a pile. What requires installation: connecting your fax line and document flow on your own machine, and setting your filing rules — this demo makes no clinical decision.